Update: John Hammersley prepared an online file that shows the difference between codes at Vince Knight‘s suggestion. But, in the end, all methods has some features that serve you better than others. Flexibility of the first method is the key for my models. I tried some of them for my research notes, and I prefer the first method. If you already published some papers, you’ll already have a method in your mind to do it. There’s no method that is simply the best, it’s all about applying the one which works for your needs. I trimmed “s.t.” since it leads a dirty result.ĭisadvantages: Manual alignment of extra parts (for all, etc.), objective function may shift if you use long constraints Conclusion ![]() You can think align as an array with two columns, where first column is always right-aligned and second column is always left-aligned. You can also get the same result if you use “aligned”, but this one is a different approach. To me, it looks good for this example.ĭisadvantages: Again, you need to switch between style modes (\displaystyle) 4) Align If your constraints have similar size, then you may like the result. This has similar problems to Aligned method. It’s very flexible and provides tidy output even if your model is large. This is my favorite style for many reasons. Here, I will compile a list of different methods, so you don’t have to Google it or copy from your old documents every time you need it. While it may seem easier to find a template that works well, there are different ways to do it. ![]() ![]() While writing a file, many times I needed to insert an optimization model in an elegant way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |